Open Beta-please send all comments tosupport@playbookm.com
MQLs Are Vanity. SQOs Are Victory
MQLsCampaign PlanningAnalyticsAutomation

MQLs Are Vanity. SQOs Are Victory

In today’s self-directed B2B buying landscape, the traditional MQL has become more of a vanity metric than a value metric. It’s time to shift your focus to the metric that actually connects marketing performance to revenue outcomes.

MQLs aren’t the goal. Revenue is.

At PlaybookM, we don’t believe in false dichotomies. MQLs aren’t dead—but they’ve become dangerously overrated when they’re mistaken for business impact.

Here’s what’s actually happening—and what matters more.


Context: How We Got Here

Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs) were created to solve a coordination problem between marketing and sales. A shared definition of “qualified” was meant to improve handoffs and pipeline performance.

But things changed.

1. Buyers Changed

Modern B2B buyers no longer want to talk to sales early in the journey. In fact, Gartner reports that B2B buyers now spend only 17% of their time meeting with potential suppliers—and just 5–6% with any one sales rep.
(Gartner, 2023)

The rest of the time, they’re self-educating across websites, peer reviews, Slack groups, and social content. That means they don’t “convert” in the traditional sense. The linear funnel—lead → MQL → SQL → close—is broken.

2. Marketing Tech Made It Easy to Game the System

With marketing automation, gated content, and lead scoring, it’s become simple to inflate MQL numbers by counting any form fill or whitepaper download as a qualified lead—even if that person had no buying intent.

This is where Dave Gerhardt’s line rings true:

“If your MQLs don’t buy, then it’s not a marketing win. It’s a reporting illusion.”

He's pointing out that activity isn't the same as impact. If marketing hits its MQL goals but none of those people turn into pipeline or revenue, it’s not a win—it’s just noise that looks good in a monthly report.


MQLs Are Still Useful — Just Not Strategic

We’re not saying you should ignore MQLs. They can still:

But they’re directional, not definitive. They belong in the same category as:

Useful? Yes.
But decisive? No.

They don’t prove intent, and they certainly don’t correlate tightly with revenue.


What You Should Track Instead: SQOs

A Sales Qualified Opportunity (SQO) is where marketing actually proves its worth.

An SQO is someone who has:

Unlike an MQL, an SQO is tied to pipeline, tracked in CRM, and linked directly to revenue potential.

And it’s not just us saying this.

According to Forrester, only 0.75% of MQLs become closed-won deals
(Forrester Blog, 2021).

Further, B2B organizations that align around opportunity-based metrics, not leads, see:


PlaybookM’s Perspective

At PlaybookM, we believe that marketing should be measured by what sales can use—not what dashboards can count.

We still track MQLs, but we treat them like early signals. Our real performance metrics are:

Because marketing doesn’t just fill the funnel—it fuels revenue.


TL;DR

As Chris Walker (Passetto) said:

“You can’t deposit MQLs in the bank.”

And as Dave Gerhardt added:

“If your MQLs don’t buy, then it’s not a marketing win. It’s a reporting illusion.”


Sources

  1. Forrester: Why B2B Marketers Must Embrace Opportunity-Based Metrics
  2. 6sense: State of the B2B Buyer Journey 2023
  3. Gartner: B2B Buying Journey
  4. Gartner: Account-Based Marketing Framework
  5. Chris Walker on LinkedIn
  6. Dave Gerhardt on LinkedIn

Photo by Laura Chouette on Unsplash